Hi Fabian, That's a good point; I'm not sure about this, though, as I don't want to suggest that this is a different font - it isn't, it's just a DFSG packaging of the same font.
If there's a trademark issue, though, then of course that's a different matter. Best wishes, Julian On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 01:31:31PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Hi Julian, > this is highly appreciated, thanks for all the effort you put into this! > I'd recommend to avoid the "awesome" part of the name altogether. Font Awesome > upstream apparently changed his mind and had become rather hostile towards > open > development, so we shouldn't give them more reason to feel under attack. > How about "font-dfsgsome" or "font-handsome" or whatever wordplay you like? > - Fabian
