On Tue, 2022-10-11 at 12:53 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2017-04-07 11:42:54, Todd Brandt wrote: > > On Thu, 06 Apr 2017 22:20:04 +0000 Bart Martens > > <ba...@quantz.debian.org> wrote: > > > noowner 859739 > > > stop > > > > > > A wnpp bug of type RFP should not have an owner. > > > > I understand. I originally tagged it as ITP because I wanted to own > > it > > but require a sponsor. If you require a sponsor is ITP even > > allowed? > > yes, I would think so. you can create a Debian package even if you're > not part of Debian per se, and then the sponsor is the person who > actually reviews the work and uploads it in Debian. > > So in that sense, yes, it makes sense for an ITP to require a > sponsor. > > This looks like a really interesting tool, are you still planning on > packaging it? > > A. > I've kept the debian folder mostly up to date so it's still capable of being packaged. I include the source in the linux kernel source tree in the tools folder, but I would very much like to see this thing show up on ubuntu with an apt-cache search. If I could get a sponsor I'd be happy to work with them.
