Updating gnulib can solve the problem of compiling diffutils in rebootstrap
https://salsa.debian.org/helmutg/rebootstrap/-/commit/1b6e4c4d113857a1ffded7d4633354c1b62b0035 On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 12:55 AM Santiago Vila <sanv...@debian.org> wrote: > > El 20/1/23 a las 16:43, Han Gao escribió: > > Package: diffutils > > Version: 1:3.8-3 > > Severity: wishlist > > Tags: ftbfs > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > In [1][2], loong64 support is added in gnulib. > > In [3], the change already is in debian. > > Please update gnulib to add support loong64 > > > > [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2021-09/msg00030.html > > [2] > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=b50c6442e43d79471a31a2a202d3e50c0557446f > > [3] > > https://sources.debian.org/src/gnulib/20230113%2Bstable-1/m4/stack-direction.m4/#L42 > > This was already reported here: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025140 > > and it was already fixed in version 3.8-2: > > * Define SIGSEGV_FAULT_STACKPOINTER for loongarch. Closes: #1025140. > Temporarily enable autoreconf for the above to work. > > Please clarify if there was anything wrong in the above bug and whether > or not the problem is actually solved. > > Also, please clarify if diffutils 3.9 (from upstream) which was > recently released still needs to be changed. When I try to apply the patch > in version 3.8-2 to the 3.9 version, the patch still may be applied (it's not > rejected), > does this mean the authors didn't use a gnulib which was recent enough when > making the 3.9 release? > > Thanks.
