On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 12:57:53AM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, Lorenzo Puliti wrote: > > >This package "only" recommands e2fsprogs, so I think it should just > > fsck is util-linux, not e2fsprogs.
Yes, but fsck.ext4 is e2fsprogs and that is what is missing in #1028181. A clean way of handling missing filesystem-specific fsck isn't immediately apparent to me. fsck doesn't distinguish a missing filesystem-specific checker from other operational errors. Mark
