Package: e2fsprogs Version: 1.46.6~rc1-1+b1 Please instead of making users nervous by just saying:
fsck from util-linux 2.38.1 Inode 65923 extent tree (at level 1) could be shorter. IGNORED. Please simply add "use run e2fsck -f" to fix: Inode 65923 extent tree (at level 1) could be shorter. IGNORED. Use run e2fsck -f" to fix. It works!: # e2fsck -f /dev/mmcblk0p2 e2fsck 1.46.6-rc1 (12-Sep-2022) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 65923 extent tree (at level 1) could be shorter. Optimize<y>? yes That way users would know how to avoid getting the warning forever. Also they wouldn't need to do https://www.google.com/search?q=Inode+extent+tree+(at+level+1)+could+be+shorter.+IGNORED. as you see many many have.
