@Jakub > As far as I can see, this RFS hasn't been filed as a new bug, but > instead it was delivered to the ITP bug, where it's unlikely to been > seen. > > I think it's because your mail had the bug number in the subject, so BTS > treated it a bug reply (even though it was sent to the submit@ address). >
Thank you for pointing out this significant detail. Based on the public archive of the mailing list, I assume /this time/ the message reached the intended audience. -- Norwid Behrnd
