Control: tags -1 + pending
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
I have no problem fixing this up in unstable, but I think this does
not warrant a stable update.
That would be unfortunate, as it means we will probably never have a
stable release without FTBFS bugs.
"Never" is too hard, I will fix it in unstable targetting bookworm, so
the next release should have it.
Since backporting those kind of bugs is completely trivial, I'm still
aiming at having a stable distribution which is free from FTBFS bugs (of
any kind). You are of course free not to help me in my goal, but it would
help immensely if every maintainer ensured that their own packages are
free from FTBFS bugs in stable.
I somehow have my doubt that the release-team would be happy to have a
lot of stable updates fixing just a FTBFS that does not happen with the
default buildd configuration. I totally agree about the severity of
other FTBFS bugs in stable.
Bernhard
