[Looked briefly into this, since this is a RC bug] * Otto Kekäläinen [Sat Mar 19, 2022 at 09:04:21AM -0700]:
> Thanks for looking into this. Can you elaborate why you filed this on > 26.4.8 and not latest 26.4.10? > > Builds are passing. Thus tests indicate that there is no issue. What is the > broken thing exactly and since tests are passing, how will we verify that > the broken thing is fixed or still broken? The problems seems to to present also in version 26.4.11-1+b1: | Running suite(s): gu::asio | terminate called after throwing an instance of 'gu::Exception' | what(): error opening datagram socketudp://127.0.0.1:0: 1 (Operation not permitted) | at ./galerautils/src/gu_asio_datagram.cpp:resolve_and_open():107 | terminate called after throwing an instance of 'gu::Exception' | what(): error opening datagram socketudp://127.0.0.1:0: 1 (Operation not permitted) | at ./galerautils/src/gu_asio_datagram.cpp:resolve_and_open():107 | terminate called after throwing an instance of 'gu::Exception' | what(): error opening datagram socketudp://127.0.0.1:0: 1 (Operation not permitted) | at ./galerautils/src/gu_asio_datagram.cpp:resolve_and_open():107 | terminate called after throwing an instance of 'gu::Exception' | what(): error opening datagram socketudp://127.0.0.1:0: 1 (Operation not permitted) | at ./galerautils/src/gu_asio_datagram.cpp:resolve_and_open():107 | 94%: Checks: 77, Failures: 0, Errors: 4 | ./galerautils/tests/gu_asio_test.cpp:1811:E:test_datagram_open:test_datagram_open:0: (after this point) Received signal 6 (Aborted) | ./galerautils/tests/gu_asio_test.cpp:1820:E:test_datagram_connect:test_datagram_connect:0: (after this point) Received signal 6 (Aborted) | ./galerautils/tests/gu_asio_test.cpp:1829:E:test_datagram_open_connect:test_datagram_open_connect:0: (after this point) Received signal 6 (Aborted) | ./galerautils/tests/gu_asio_test.cpp:1894:E:test_datagram_send_to_and_async_read:test_datagram_send_to_and_async_read:0: (after this point) Received signal 6 (Aborted) | Running suite(s): gu::DeqMap | 100%: Checks: 11, Failures: 0, Errors: 0 | Total tests failed: 4 -- https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=galera-4&arch=amd64&ver=26.4.11-1%2Bb1&stamp=1652901726&raw=0 Looking at https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=galera-4&arch=amd64 it seems to be failing always at the x86-conova-01 builders, which means that it seems to be environment specific. AFAICS x86-conova-01 is IPv6 only, and this is also what "FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds" in the original bug report was about. Possibly useful for further information/reproducing: * https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2020/07/msg00070.html * https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952740 HTH && regards -mika-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
