Am Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 12:22:53PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > No, it's not. If you check the logs from r-bioc-htsfilter for example > (https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-htsfilter/28944996/log.gz), > you see that some packages have actual regressions:
The log has Get:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing/main r-bioc-htsfilter 1.36.0+dfsg-1 (dsc) [2,244 B] which is BioC 3.15. In unstable is r-bioc-htsfilter 1.38.0+dfsg-2 which belongs to Bioc 3.15 > Removing autopkgtest-satdep (0) ... > autopkgtest [19:15:37]: test run-unit-test: [----------------------- > cp: cannot stat '/usr/share/doc/r-bioc-htsfilter/tests/*': No such file or > directory This line is in the test of the *old* package and was fixed in 1.38.0+dfsg-2. I can't do anything about this, sorry. > > If this might help and is easily to realise removing all r-bioc-* > > packages from testing could enable the migration of the packages in > > unstable. > > I've done that now. Thanks. This will hopefully solve that situation. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
