On 2022-11-22 21:41:15 +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote: > Greetings Sebastian, > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 08:17:41PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Hi Filippo > > > > On 2022-11-11 10:56:08 +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote: > > > Greetings Sebastian, > > > > > > Thank your for your message. > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 11:04:54PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > Control: forwarded -1 > > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-qcustomplot.html > > > > > > > > Hi Filippo > > > > > > > > On 2022-11-06 15:29:32 +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote: > > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: lopi...@debian.org, gl...@debian.org, > > > > > debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > > > > > > > > > (please explain about the transition: impacted packages, reason, ... > > > > > for more info see: > > > > > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions) > > > > > > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > > > > > Fundamental reason: Qt5 and Qt6 are in the archive. > > > > > > > > > > I am requesting a transition from package libqcustomplot2.0 to > > > > > libqcustomplot2.1. Source package is qcustomplot. The change involves > > > > > a change > > > > > in the library name itself, from libqcustomplot2.0 to both > > > > > libQCustomPlot2.1 and > > > > > libQCustomPlotQt6.so.2.1.0 (see below). > > > > > > > > > > I have prepared the packaging in the following git repos branch: > > > > > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/qcustomplot/-/tree/qt5-and-qt6 > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > For the libs under my control, the transition is already prepared and > > > > > these > > > > > projects are going to be linking against the Qt6-built library, > > > > > contrary to all > > > > > the other packages detailed below. > > > > > > > > > > For the other libs listed above, I have already checked that they > > > > > would build if > > > > > some modifications were performed. I have already git branches ready > > > > > for the > > > > > packages under git VCS. For the others (source deb), I have patches > > > > > available. > > > > > > > > > > The modifications are lean: change -lqcustomplot to -lQCustomPlot for > > > > > many and > > > > > also sometimes use the CMake-based configuration involving first > > > > > find_package(QCustomPlot) and second the QCustomPlot::QCustomPlot > > > > > formalism for > > > > > the linker. > > > > > > > > > > That is: almost one- or two-liner patches. > > > > > > > > Could you please file bugs for those so that maintainers are aware? > > > > > > Yes, I'll do that. I have already informed them individually of the > > > process and > > > provided them with the relevant patch. > > > > Thanks! Please go ahead with the transition. > > I just uploaded the package to unstable. I have not closed the bug yet, > waiting > to check that everything goes fine.
Transition bugs are usually closedonce all old binary packages got removed from testing. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
