On 2022-09-03 15:59:44 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 2022-07-15 14:03:24 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > Quoting Sebastian Ramacher (2022-07-13 22:52:52) > > > On 2021-09-29 10:38:07 +0200, jo...@mister-muffin.de wrote: > > > > > Do all reverse dependencies build fine with the new Imagemagick > > > > > version? > > > > > If not, have bugs been filed? > > > > > > > > I have rebuilt all 399 source packages that have at least one binary > > > > produced > > > > by src:imagemagick in their build dependency installation closure. Of > > > > those, 16 > > > > packages FTBFS with the imagemagick version form experimental but > > > > succeed with > > > > the version from unstable. Of those, only one package (src:wand) is in > > > > the list > > > > from https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-imagemagick.html > > > > I filed > > > > this failure as #995290 and will investigate the other 15 instances as > > > > well. > > > > But since those source packages are not part of the transition, they > > > > should > > > > probably not block this bug. > > > > > > This transition completly dropped off my radar, sorry! > > > > > > What's the current status of the preparations? Have the bugs been filed? > > > > we had one build failure in src:wand which I fixed in imagemagick upload of > > 8:6.9.12.20+dfsg1-1.2 to experimental. See also #995290 > > Please go ahead
This upload did not happen. Was the status here? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
