On 2022-11-06 11:36:16 +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 8:14 PM Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> > wrote: > > > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > On 2022-11-05 00:11:07 +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > > -- > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 10:22:32PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > As of today only v4l-utils and bpfcc still fails to build with libbpf > > > > in experimental. > > > > > > > > v4l-utils is a key package, I will look into its fix and request the > > > > libbpf transition after that. > > > > > > All the packages except bpfcc (#1018818) now builds fine with > > > libbpf/1.0.1-1 > > > from experimental. I can help bpfcc maintainers with the porting to new > > > libbpf > > > but they have not replied to the bug report or to my mails. > > > > > > Please consider libbpf for transition. > > > > Please go ahead > > Thanks. Has been uploaded.
The autopkgtests of dpdk regressed on amd64: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/d/dpdk/28081847/log.gz Could you please take a look? Best Sebastian -- Sebastian Ramacher
