On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 11:33:53AM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote: > Why did you lower the severity when pam is violating the Policy?
The existing copyright file precisely documents a free software license under which the contents of the package can be distributed and modified. The copyright file should be improved (thank you for the patch). But claiming that it is violating policy is nonsense. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
