On 10.05.06 Brooks Moses ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > At 10:16 AM 5/10/2006, you wrote:
Hi, > >> This patch was incorporated in the version 1.3c update, which > >> has been posted to CTAN earlier today and should makes its way > >> around the various CTAN mirrors in the next couple of days or > >> so. > >> > >Noticed that. Tagging the bugs as fixed upstream in our BTS. Please > >drop us a note if there is an update for the last bug too. > > The CJK one, you mean? > Yes I do. > At first glance, I don't know that I hold out much hope for that > one; my impression is that CJK does weird things to get around the > TeX 256-character limit, and listings does its own processing that > doesn't deal at all well with that sort of weird thing. I could > improve the part of the documentation that covers the > incompatibility, I suppose. > Sorry! I should have read the bug before bothering you. In there bug is already a note that this is a known limitation and a suggested workaround. However we did not get a response from the submitter if the workaround helps. About the documentation: I just grepped through the sources of the cjk package and did not find the string "cjk": I found a paragraph containineg the word chinese "The extended characters don't cover Arabic, Chinese, Hebrew, Japanese, and so on. Read section 7 for details on work-arounds." Maybe it should be said more clearly that CJK and listings are incompatible. Regards, Hilmar -- sigfault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
