Package: base-files Version: 12.3 Followup-For: Bug #1008735 X-Debbugs-Cc: witold.bary...@gmail.com
I am somehow confused by the current solution in base-files 12.3. bookworm: $ lsb_release -s -i -d -r -c No LSB modules are available. Debian Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid n/a bookworm $ sid: $ lsb_release -s -i -d -r -c No LSB modules are available. Debian Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid n/a bookworm $ How one can distinguish between testing / bookworm and sid now? Do I need to parse files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ now, maybe using `apt-cache policy base-files` ? There are practical situations where bookworm and sid are out of sync for months, and this is important to distinguish in many places. Regards, Witold -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-rc3 (SMP w/32 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages base-files depends on: ii gawk [awk] 1:5.1.0-1 ii mawk [awk] 1.3.4.20200120-3.1 base-files recommends no packages. base-files suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
