Hi Lev, On 23-10-2022 09:08, Lev Lamberov wrote:
Сб 22 окт 2022 @ 21:27 Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org>:With a recent upload of swi-prolog the autopkgtest of logol fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of swi-prolog from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In tabular form:I've tried to build the logol package against swi-prolog in unstable on s390x porterbox and it was successful. I'm not sure whether it runs the same tests as during the autopkgtest testing. Unfortunately, I cannot test these rebuilt logol packages on s390x at the moment. The last change in the swi-prolog package was related to a bug concerning broken handling of endiannes (the bug was seen on s390x indeed, but not on other architectures). Now swi-prolog should correctly handle it. Probably, logol needs to be rebuilt against this new swi-prolog.
If rebuilding is "the" solution, the change in swi-prolog feels like an ABI breakage (on big endian architectures), right? If that's true, what about the other reverse build dependencies of swi-prolog? Should all of them be rebuild? ... Hmm, we're only talking about ppl in addition to logol here.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
