On Sunday, 16 October 2022 10:16:58 CEST you wrote: > Package: mupen64plus > Severity: important > X-Debbugs-Cc: ed7-aspire4...@hotmail.com > > mupen64plus is currently unusuable with the latest SDL (at least in bookworm).
This is impossible. This package is a meta-package without dependency to SDL > > A fix has been patched into upstream: > https://github.com/mupen64plus/mupen64plus-core/pull/970 > > There are discussions of a new release: > https://github.com/mupen64plus/mupen64plus-core/issues/973 > but it's best to backport the patch to salsa for now just in case the > discussion goes nowhere. > > I don't know whether that alone fixes the problem though, but I'm pretty sure > it should still build. Can you please tell me what the difference is there to the version 2.5-9 of libmupen64plus2 [1] Kind regards, Sven https://tracker.debian.org/news/1372713/accepted-mupen64plus-core-25-9-source-into-unstable/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
