Am Dienstag, dem 27.09.2022 um 14:57 +0200 schrieb Diederik de Haas: > AFAIC, the question that remains is about its impact. > On my Xen server I did not see the mentioned problem, so it looks like it is > hardware dependent? (I did not do an extensive test though) > > And for systems that are affected is how bad the consequences are. What I've > seen in this bug report is an error message in the log wrt gnutls. I don't > know > whether this makes every application using gnutls not working at all anymore. > I also don't know whether other applications and how many are affected and to > what extend. > Marek and Patrick, can you shed some light on this?
I found this applications in syslog: traps: exim4[1541245] trap invalid opcode ip:7f2117b4ad7e sp:7ffe85c605c0 error:0 in libgnutls.so.30.34.1[7f2117a37000+12f000] traps: https[1524215] trap invalid opcode ip:7fee8e94ad7e sp:7ffdd89325c0 error:0 in libgnutls.so.30.34.1[7fee8e837000+12f000] traps: wget[3327] trap invalid opcode ip:7fcabc94fb0a sp:7fffdd212c80 error:0 in libgnutls.so.30.34.1[7fcabc837000+12f000] traps: cksum[1541072] trap invalid opcode ip:55e8d270ecf5 sp:7ffdbc172690 error:0 in cksum[55e8d26f8000+17000] cksum seems to have no dependency to libgnutls, at least ldd doesn't show it.
