I wouldn't call the original libarea "not actively maintained", just quieter.
Is there something that you want to to package that uses c-ares? Does c-ares maintain backward-compatibility? kcr Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: libares > Severity: wishlist > > Hello, > > there seems to be a fork of ares called c-ares, available on: > > http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/c-ares/ > > This distribution seems to be actively maintained. Would you like to > package it RSN and maybe replace libares with libcares (jeez, sounds > like Caries ;-)? If not, please reassign to WNPP as RFP. > > Thanks, > Eduard. > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: testing/unstable > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash > Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8 > Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
