hi thomas, no problem, i'd like to help. oc-mpc is 3.3.95 right now, as upstream were proud to announce.
if you could find out what tweaks are needed for ace+tao, they may even not hurt a pure oci-mpc distribution. in the meantime, i'd also check the project i'm working on with both the versions. alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Selon alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>hi thomas, >> >>i have needed mpc to package another program. >> >>i'd rather use your prepared package, of course. >> >>pitty the aleged upstream authors (oci), didn't know anything about your >>effort. > > > Well, as you may know, OCI's version is upstream. The DOC group uses a > snapshot version for ACE+TAO[0] development, and this is the version > packaged as mpc-ace. You may find out that the mpc-ace version is > outdated. > > If that happen please let me know, and together we'll move toward the OCI > version, therefore deprecating mpc-ace. I know that ACE+TAO can be > compiled with OCI's MPC with some tweaks. > > >>please close my itp bugs in your changelog, and tell me how could i >>totally cancel oci-mpc in favour of your package. > > > I don't need to mention this ITP in ACE+TAO packages changelog. > > As soon as you have find out that mpc-ace MPC version fits your needs, > i.e. you can build your package with it, then you can close the ITP > by yourself stating that oci-mpc is not needed because of mpc-ace. > If mpc-ace does not fit, we'll use this ITP to move to OCI's version. > > Do you agree ? > > Thanks, > > Thomas > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
