[Steffen Moeller] > You just mean the RM request for those architectures to be issued, > right? IMHO we should not change anything concerning the Debian > packaging since those reverse dependencies per se are not platform > dependent.
I mean to talk to the reverse dependency maintainers. It might be less work to fix the regression on mips64el instead of just yanking the architecture from the list of supported architectures. The segfault listed on <URL: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=yosys&arch=mips64el > might be simple to fix and trigger a bug that also exist but is hidden on other architectures. Once the path forward is agreed with the reverse dependency maintainers, one of the options might be for them to drop mips64el from their packages too (and request the removal of their mips64el packages from the archive). -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen
