On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 08:12:10AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 04:23:14PM +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > I think a separate pkg-config file for libroken would be reasonable. > > Ideally this would be upstream rather than Debian-specific. Let's take > > this to the upstream bug tracker. > > Splitting up libroken into a shared package would probably be good. > > But I don't see this happening anytime spoon. There simply isn't anyone > willing to do the work. Plus there has to be people willing to use it if > the work was done, not convinced that will happen either. > > As this is outside the scope of what I can do as a package maintainer I > have tagged this "wontfix".
Yeah, that seems reasonable. The main motivator here was Samba, but it has also gone into the other direction on this - basically just vendoring in a copy of Heimdal, rather than linking against system Heimdal. (I'm personally also no longer involved in either Samba or Heimdal development)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
