On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 07:45:56PM -0500, pryzbyj wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 01:07:38PM -0500, pryzbyj wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 04:37:10PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 12:57:03PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I was wondering if you'd accept a debian-specific patch for the bug > > > > > > you opened on operators(7) [0]. Its tagged 'upstream', and I hope > > > > > > the > > > > > > changes can get propogated as such.. > > > > > > > > > > Which patch are you talking about? > > > > The one I started writting last night. I tried to add a third column, > > > > which didn't work, so I'm going to move all the text into paragraphs > > > > and include more content; stuff like "don't use ++ within a function > > > > call; its undefined". > > > > > > I can't judge on anything I haven't seen. Also, I need to discuss this > > > with Michael. I'd appreciate a patch as a step forward at least. > > Understood. I'm including the full page; consider it an initial > > draft.I'd like to add a third column to the table, giving the names > Second draft: add third column. tbl is nice. Added some bold and > underline, which probably aren't quite right right. > > This manpages is BSD style; should I make it "Debian style" by using > the same formatting tags as the debmake template (and dropping stuff > like ".Os")? Michael, could you comment on the state of this patch to operator.7?
Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
