* Michael Prokop [Wed Aug 17, 2022 at 11:42:11AM +0200]: > * Michael Prokop [Thu Aug 11, 2022 at 01:17:50PM +0200]: > > * Lucas Nussbaum [Fri Jun 24, 2022 at 12:04:39PM +0200]: > > > > Source: xfsdump > > > Version: 3.1.9+0+nmu2 > > > Severity: serious > > > Justification: FTBFS > [...] > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > > > on amd64. > > > AFAICS the new upstream release v3.1.10 of xfsdump (see > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfsdump-dev.git/) doesn't seem > > to fix this issue. Also updating xfsprogs to latest upstream git > > (see https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfsprogs-dev.git/), to > > provide more recent xfslibs-dev + xfsprogs, doesn't seem to help > > either. > > > > So it might be worth reaching out to upstream, though > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-xfs is unavailable right now and I'm not > > sure what other ways exist to check/report this towards upstream? > > > > FTR, xfsdump got removed from Debian testing/bookworm due to this RC > > bug a few days ago. > > Having marc.info available again, I just checked its current > situation and it looks like an according patch is available (see thread > `Subject: [PATCH] xfs_restore: remove DMAPI support` on xfs list): [...]
And v3.1.11 got released on 2022-08-26, the release seems to include the patch which should fix this issue. Nathan, could you please upload xfsdump v3.1.11 to Debian? (Sadly the packaging is not available on salsa or alike, otherwise I would have prepared a PR/MR) regards -mika-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
