tags 1018697 +pending thanks Le lundi 29 août 2022 à 12:52 +0100, Jelmer Vernooij a écrit : > tags 1018697 +confirmed > thanks > > Hi Martin, > > Thanks for the bug report. > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 09:40:58AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote: > > I am always reluctant to apply the merge requests of deb-scrub-obsolete, > > because I'm not sure of which release I cut off while applying these > > changes. > > It would be really helpful if the script could augment the changelog to add > > the > > release name since which the removed versionning is useless, please. > > There is a release name in the changelog entry at the moment. Do you > have a proposed format/wording for the changelog?
My bad. I should have re-tested it before filling this bug report. Older MR opened by the Debian Janitor did not mention it, so I have many such MR rotting on salsa, but they were fixed in between. Ahem, I'm ashamed. Taging the bug as pending as only the following was valid, and you fixed it. Thanks! > > Along the same line, it could be helpful to document in the deb-scrub- > > obsolete > > manpage the list of accepted releases. In particular, I'm wondering whether > > I > > have to use a codename such as bookworm, or whether an alias such as old- > > old- > > stable is acceptable. > Both should work, but I've just added a note in the manpage. Thanks! > > I'll leave the bug report open for the first issue. > > Cheers, > > Jelmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
