Control: tags -1 - patch Control: block -1 by 1001457 [Written communication is hard] It should be noticed that I did communicate privately with Tobias and I mentioned multiple times both issues are linked.
> I was debugging into this, and IMHO this is not a compiler issue, but a > packaging problem: No. I've uploaded 9.1.0-4 so that this is plain obvious there is no packaging issue. I apologize for the bumpy transition debhelper 11 -> 13. I did not pay attention openvdb was messed up with debhelper >= 13. > The attached build should be able to proof that. Thanks for time and work. > As this is NOT a libstd++ bug, I'm removing the indication that #1001457 > blocks this bug. Yes. It is *exactly* this bug. Although I am not familiar with GCC internals so the description of the bug may be a bit inaccurate. In any case, the 9.1.0-4 upload made it extremely clear there is an issue (I claim this is a 'wrong-code' per GCC bugzilla terminology). To be extra pedantic, I also included a (commented out) patch in 9.1.0-4: * https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/openvdb/-/blob/debian/9.1.0-4/debian/patches/gcc_pr_103629.patch For anyone interested in solving #1001457, you can activate this patch in the d/p/series file. -M --- I've spent an insane amount of time reducing the (large!) openvdb codebase into something GCC dev would accept as Problem Report in bugzilla. I will now give up and simply remove the visibility flag stuff. openvdb never provided a symbol flag so this should be acceptable.
