On 28.04.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi,
> I've had an alternative idea how to fix problems of that sort. > Currently, we add the files with a patch in debian/patches, or in > the uuencoded missingfiles.tar.gz if it's a binary file. > > What about build-depending on tetex-src instead, and copying the > files from its tree into the install tree? The obvious > disadvantage is that it requires even more downloading (55MB). But > it saves human resources > - regenerating the missingfiles.tar.gz e.g. > > It would also ease changes to documentation - we could just fix it > in tetex-src's source, compile the dvi file in its build process, > and copy that into tetex-doc's install tree. On the other hand, > any fix would require two uploads... > Wouldn't that mean, that tetex-base build depends on itself? I've doubt that this is good idea. H. -- sigmentation fault
