Linas Vepstas <linasveps...@gmail.com> writes: > Wow! Well, I feel kind of dumb to not actually have tried that; I have been > trained that SIGSEGV is a full stop, and it's pointless to try to > continue. Thank you!
Of course, and I might well not have assumed otherwise either -- but yeah, I have the impression that libgc does some "interesting" things. > I can't imagine I will be the first and only one to be surprised by this > change of behavior, but I can't think of a good solution to propose, just > right now. Agreed, I suppose we could consider adding it to a README.Debian, but not sure people (including me) would notice it in the relvant circumstances. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
