* Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha: > Is there an easy way to regenerate that header to get the tatest > syscalls? Maybe a command could be supplied so that users (or at > least distributors) have it easy to regenerate them? Maybe it already > exists but it's not widely known?
I have recently backported the syscall-names.list updates to glibc 2.34, but not glibc 2.33. It's a simple backport. We could perhaps enhance the glibc build process that it uses the union of the known system call names and what's found in the kernel headers. Thanks, Florian
