Piscium <grok...@gmail.com> (2022-07-17): > The Bullseye file that I used to successfully install Sid [3] is > timestamped 05-Jul-2022 15:57, which is only 12 days old. If you > compare the two links below in [2] and [3], the difference is that [2] > is in unstable (one year old file) and [3] is in bullseye (12 days > old). The bullseye file is recent whereas the Sid file is ancient. > This is counter-intuitive.
We shouldn't have let so much time go by without putting out an alpha release, so yes, the situation you're describing is less than ideal. The debian-installer package got updated for the 11.4 point release (bullseye), and it was propagated upward (prop-up) to testing/unstable to satisfy version constraints; but the same doesn't happen for the contents of the installer-* directories, hence the timestamp differences you're seeing. > Cyril said "there seem to be some weird things going on, mixing and > matching bits from bullseye and unstable?". Yes, it seems so, or at > least something along those lines. > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUnstable > [2] > http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/mini.iso > (FAILURE) > [3] > http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/bullseye/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/mini.iso > (SUCCESS) Until an alpha release of the installer finds its way to unstable, I'd advise using daily builds: https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/daily-build-overview.html https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/ Note that the netboot mini.iso builds fine, but using lvm2 at runtime is likely to be problematic due to: https://bugs.debian.org/1015174 Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
