Hi Sylvestre,
at first, I thought it may be a squeekboard coding issue too, but the fact that 
the
same code breaks with rustc 1.59 and not 1.58 made me think of a
regression (be it squeekboard 1.17.1 or 1.18.0). Also, only rust
components where changed for this test : exact same gcc etc ..
If rustc changed it's behaviour in between, at least the compiler would
have given an advice or a tip. Anyway this does not occur on other
architectures, so yes, I rather think it may be some thorny ppc64el
regression on rustc side, but that is only an assumption.
I'm no rust expert to maybe try a different layout of the code or maybe
rust link option that could help and workaround that linking issue for
the time being.

F.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to