Hi Mo, On 08-06-2022 16:16, M. Zhou wrote:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=luajit autopkgtest on ibm archs encountered somewhat regression, since I only removed Conflicts+Replaces from the src:luajit side.
I think there one more *test* issue, the first test in src:luajit doens't explicitly declare dependencies, which means it implicitly has has '@'. Quoting [1]:
``@`` stands for the package(s) generated by the source package
containing the tests; each dependency (strictly, or-clause, which
may contain ``|``\ s but not commas) containing ``@`` is replicated
once for each such binary package, with the binary package name
substituted for each ``@`` (but normally ``@`` should occur only
once and without a version restriction).
Which means that autopkgtest asks apt to make sure all packages from
src:luajit are installed, but the dependency tree of bin:luajit
conflicts with some. This can be solved by only depending on luajit, as
that pulls in the required packages anyways.
lua-moses autopkgtest failure [2] looks bad (still a segmentation fault): autopkgtest [07:20:14]: test command9: luajit debian/tests/simple.lua autopkgtest [07:20:14]: test command9: [-----------------------bash: line 1: 1240 Segmentation fault bash -ec 'luajit debian/tests/simple.lua' 2> >(tee -a /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.u7chaju_/downtmp/command9-stderr >&2) > >(tee -a /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.u7chaju_/downtmp/command9-stdout)
autopkgtest [07:20:14]: test command9: -----------------------] Paul[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/raw/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst [2] https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/ppc64el/l/lua-moses/22519476/log.gz
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
