Hi! May be best to move the contents of /usr/libexec/samba to samba-libs.
shalom: -admin- [/usr/libexec/samba] $ dpkg -S `ldd samba-dcerpcd | grep samba |cut -f 1 -d ' '` |cut -f 1 -d ':' | sort |uniq libwbclient0 samba-libs If you remove the uniq: shalom: -admin- [/usr/libexec/samba] $ dpkg -S `ldd samba-dcerpcd | grep samba |cut -f 1 -d ' '` |cut -f 1 -d ':' | sort | grep samba-libs | wc -l 64 shalom: -admin- [/usr/libexec/samba] $ dpkg -S `ldd samba-dcerpcd | grep samba |cut -f 1 -d ' '` |cut -f 1 -d ':' | sort | grep libwbclient0 | wc -l 9 Probably the same for the rest of /usr/libexec/samba Hope this helps. Matt Grant Debian Developer PS: Have a good set up here at home for testing and development. 2 smbd servers, witn 2 samba AD server kvm virtuals, and client kerberos workstations, all mostly configured using ansible. Also extensively uses ZFS. Mostly use all of this at my employer. On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 04:41, Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote: > 02.06.2022 19:06, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-06-02 at 18:37 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > .. > >> Where does one can find some information about these new binaries, > >> > >> how they're being used and by what? > > > > Ask us really, particularly if there isn't a manpage. This new DCE/RPC > > Andrew, what's this new dce/rpc server processes, where/when they're being > used? In particular, in context of this bug report, should we split out > some of the new servers into samba-common-bin package for example, so > that winbindd can run them too? (Probably not a good idea for smbclient > which depends on samba-common-bin too). Also, should these processes > be now killed/restarted together with smbd/nmbd/winbindd? > > > server approach was mentioned in the WHATSNEW, but perhaps not to the > > detail you need. > > See the first changelog entry for debian samba 4.16.0 package :) > > Thank you! > > /mjt >
