Hi Emmanuel, On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 06:43:59PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi Tony, > > Sorry for that, there are so many Java packages and so few maintainers > that we rarely have concurrency issues and I'm not used to check the > ownership of the bugs. I assumed you were working on netty following > your comment on #1011135 yesterday, and I picked controlsfx instead. > I'll try to be more careful. I hope you'll be able to rebase your work > without too much trouble.
It certainly is true that we have plenty of packages to go around and that concurrency issues are rare. The rebase is no problem, of course; we were doing the same freshening and I can just reset --hard. Since you're doing a lot of heavy lifting detecting and triaging all of these Java 17 bugs, my primary motivation for mentioning it is the hope that we can help you squash them by claiming them. I have been poking at netty for a while (more for the open CVEs). I will claim that one. :) Cheers, tony
