On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 11:00:55PM +1000, Craig Small wrote: > It looks like that offending code wasn't removed, it was just > relocated further along [1].
Ah, my bad! All the indentation differences in the original patch made it unclear to me what it actually did… > Looking at what they have done for net-snmp 5.9.2 snmplib/snmp_api.c > isn't changed between 5.9 and 5.9.2 so I'll apply it as the problem > isn't going away. Wonderful, thanks a bunch. I presume this won't land in stable anytime soon though, right, but maybe in backports? > Your bug report was fine BTW. If there was an easy proof of concept > that is even better but this looks like its a timing issue with > delayed responses. The information helped get a resolution for me > pretty quickly. That's good to hear. Duly noted re: the PoC! All the best, Ole -- Ole Peder Brandtzæg | Assistant Manager, ITK I can see you now, as through a screen A smile on your face, your fingers dripping kerosene
