Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Uh, it does *not* happen, I just checked it. I know that
Guuuut. >> at runtime in the cache directories. If a recursive change was needed, >> that would rule out the possibility of using dpkg-statoverride, because >> I suppose it can only be used for files registered in the dpkg database. > > Yes, but it would also only be needed for them - for the others there's > no possibility of dpkg overriding user's changes. I see. You fear that dpkg resets the owner/perms for the files it manages. But AFAIK, that has never been reported, right? *If* someone reports such a problem, OK, adding the 2nd mechanism using dpkg-statoverride would be sensible. But otherwise, do you really need to bother?... -- Florent
