Thanks for the update. Having a Debian package (even an unofficial one) would be nice. I can still post install instructions for it in our README file.
Is it possible to rename the existing package or add warning to it to let people know the "doas" package in Debian is actually OpenDoas and not the slicer69/doas package. I'd like to avoid confusion on that front. Jesse On 2022-05-06 8:04 p.m., Scupake wrote: > Hello, > > A little update on this issue. I found out that I am not be able to > upload both packages into the Debian repositories since the two programs are > too similar to each other. However I can provide packages for slicer69/doas on > a git repo since the packaging for it is pretty much done. > I am sorry about not being able to include slicer69/doas in the Debian > repos. >
