Re: tony mancill
> Package: cqrlog
> Depends: cqrlog-data (= ${source:Version}), ..
> Breaks: cqrlog-data (<< 2.5.2-2)
> Replaces: cqrlog-data (<< 2.5.2-2)
>
> and
>
> Package: cqrlog-data
> Breaks: cqrlog (<< 2.4.0)
> Replaces: cqrlog (<< 2.4.0)
>
> Since the version in stable is > 2.4.0, I'm interested in thoughts on
> whether I can drop the Breaks/Depends in this upload of cqrlog-data to
> avoid having a circular Breaks/Replaces relationship between cqrlog and
> cqrlog-data if someone tried to update directly from oldstable
> (2.3.0-2).
Good question. I'd say it's not circular since it's << and one of the
versions (the package being upgraded) will always be newer.
I'd leave it around since it doesn't hurt and might help people a bit.
Possibly some comments in debian/control explaining both might help us
revisit that for trixie.
Christoph
