On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 09:43:53AM +0200, Markus Neubauer wrote: > Package: lynx > Version: 2.8.5-2sarge1 > Severity: minor > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 3.1 > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (500, 'testing') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-amd64-smp-vs > Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) > > Versions of packages lynx depends on: > ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-7 high-quality block-sorting file > co > ii libc6 2.3.6-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries > ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13.2 GNU TLS library - runtime library > ii libncursesw5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal > hand > ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime > > -- no debconf information > > -- additinal information > $ apt-get dist-upgrade > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done > Calculating Upgrade... Done > The following packages will be upgraded: > lynx > 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > Need to get 0B/1882kB of archives. > After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. > Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y > Preparing to replace lynx 2.8.5-2sarge1 (using > .../lynx_2.8.5-2sarge1_amd64.deb) ... > Setting up lynx (2.8.5-2sarge1) ... > > > $ apt-get dist-upgrade > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done > Calculating Upgrade... Done > The following packages will be upgraded: > lynx > 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > Need to get 0B/1882kB of archives. > After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. > Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n > Abort. This sounds like apt bug #363385. Is there an 0 epoch hiding somewhere? Where was your binary package downloaded from?
Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
