Hi Étienne, On Sat, 9 Apr 2022 11:32:03 +0200 =?utf-8?Q?=C3=89tienne?= Mollier <emoll...@emlwks999.eu> wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/3902
Thanks for forwarding the issue upstream. > There seems to be enough changes between the two versions that a > rather extensive rewrite of the muscle wrapper might be needed. > But I may miss easier approaches, we'll see what upstream will > come up with. If upstream wants to support both muscle 3 and muscle 5, then surely yes. If only muscle 5 support is needed, maybe simple adjustments to accommodate muscle's CLI changes would be enough. Nevertheless let us wait for upstream response, there is quite some time before the bookworm freeze. Best, Andrius
