On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 07:23:10PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:52:58AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > <snip/> > > > Please provide the full picture. We may re-evaluate after that. > > > > Notice that once we are going multi-arch (probably not for etch though), the > > 64bit architecture will be called powerpc64, and not ppc64. The ppc64 effort > > is a different thing, a one-man effort by Andreas Jochens mostly, who > > rebuilt > > everything in a pure-64 way, and has been sending out bug reports asking for > > ppc64 support since a long time now. > > > Can the efforts of ppc64 and powerpc64 be combined? > Where and _why_ differ ppc64 and power64???
Probably not directly, altough the same work is going to be useful for both. But then, multi-arch is probably death for etch, so ... Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
