❦ 25 March 2022 11:48 +01, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez:
>> After looking twice, I notice the VIP is in the same subnet as the peer.
>> If you don't have any other address on the subnet, I don't see how this
>> could work. If you have, maybe it would be better to use a /32 for the
>> VIP.
>
> Would you mind to elaborate?
>
> The setup is as follows:
>
> * peer 1, local IP 208.80.153.188/29
> * peer 2, local IP 208.80.153.189/29
> * VIP 208.80.153.190/29
>
> I honestly don't know how this relates to the execution error itself.
> Do you think the address assignment fails because some misconfigured
> netmask?
Usually, on Linux, VIP are using /32 to avoid issues with source address
selection. Notably, when contacting a peer, the VIP could be selected
when using a /29, while this is not possible when using a /32.
--
Its name is Public Opinion. It is held in reverence. It settles everything.
Some think it is the voice of God.
-- Mark Twain
