On Sun 13 Mar 2022 at 14:38:13 +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote: [...]
> Here I also don't quite understand libgtk upstream. I assume the intention > for the fallback is to have printing to at least work with some printers > when cups isn't running/installed. While I think that's a terrible idea we > still didn't want to break that behaviour since some users might now be > depending on it. There are users who depend on GTK's non-CUPS behaviour? Heaven help them! They are expecting an experience divorced from what the the printing system provides. They will possibly be shocked when using bookworm. The one thing GTK did correctly on buster and bullseye was handle the shared queues of remote CUPS servers. On bookworm these are are now inaccessible. A regression in its so-called "fallback" status? I do not think I will lose much sleep over this :). Regards, Brian.
