Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.1-1experimental1
Severity: normal

Running aptitude with sid+experimental (although the dependancy problem is the 
same under just sid).

Emacs21-common 21.4a-3.1 hit mirror before emacs21 and emacs21-bin-common.

Aptitude decides, instead of holding the packages at their current state, to 
try to upgrade, which breaks emacs21's dependancies, which causes it to remove 
all three packages.

If attempting to upgrade a package would require that package's removal, 
there's no point in trying to upgrade it :)

>  --\ Packages being removed because they are no longer used
>  idA  emacs21-common            -35.5MB 21.4a-3    21.4a-3.1
>  --\ Packages being deleted due to unsatisfied dependencies
>  id   emacs21                   -6042kB 21.4a-3    21.4a-3
>  idA  emacs21-bin-common        -342kB  21.4a-3    21.4a-3
>  --\ Packages being held back
>  i A  libgdl-1-0                        0.6.0-3    0.6.0-3+b1ih
>  pan                                  0.14.2.91- 0.94-1



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers experimental
  APT policy: (1000, 'experimental'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii  apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-4 0.6.43.3exp1 Advanced front-end for dpkg
hi  libc6                       2.3.6-7      GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1                     1:4.1.0-1+b1 GCC support library
ii  libncursesw5                5.5-1.1      Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsigc++-2.0-0c2a          2.0.16-3     type-safe Signal Framework for C++
ii  libstdc++6                  4.1.0-1+b1   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

Versions of packages aptitude recommends:
ii  aptitude-doc-en [ap 0.4.1-1experimental1 English manual for aptitude, a ter

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to