On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 5:52 PM Santiago R.R. <santiag...@riseup.net> wrote: > > El 28/02/22 a las 16:52, Martin-Éric Racine escribió: > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 4:42 PM Martin-Éric Racine > > <martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 4:26 PM Martin-Éric Racine > > > <martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:45 PM Santiago R.R. <santiag...@riseup.net> > > > > wrote: > > > > > * Could you please fix the indentation of the your new entry in > > > > > d/copyright? > > > > > > > > IMHO, the whole file's indentation needs to be fixed. I had troubles > > > > aligning my addition, because the file currently uses TAB+2SPACES. > > > > There really should be a linting tool for that. > > > > > > Actually, it seems that wrap-and-sort can be used for d/copyright too. > > > I somehow was under the impression that it's only used for d/control. > > > I'm extremely tempted to run it on the whole package. > > > > Reading back on Bug #964947, I notice that the request was for both > > packaging current upstream and dropping the 5 out of the package name. > > I would tend to agree. The 5 really only was meant as an upstream > > branch tag. The source and binary really should be called 'dhcpcd' > > since it essentially is a fork of the abandoned source of the same > > name. > > Changing the source name means creating (or reintroducing) a different > debian package. Just in case: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=743218 > > Changing the binary name only means it would have to pass by NEW…
Merely changing the binary name sounds perfectly reasonable to me. Martin-Éric
