Hi Ted, Quoting Theodore Ts'o (2022-02-27 14:49:13) > I was checking Debian Bug tracker to make sure the bug metadata was > correct after closing it, and I realized that you had replied on > Tuesday, February 22nd (Message #10). My apologies, for some reason > that message never arrived at my inbox (and I checked the spam filter > as well). So I didn't realize that you had replied to me with the > uploaded fix until just now. > > Many thanks for your work!
My email was rejected by your email server, claiming that my email server was suspect: > <ty...@mit.edu>: host mit-edu.mail.protection.outlook.com[104.47.57.138] said: > 550 5.7.606 Access denied, banned sending IP [188.183.5.254]. To request > removal from this list please visit https://sender.office.com/ and follow > the directions. For more information please go to > http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=526655 AS(1430) (in reply to RCPT TO > command) The general consensus among email blacklists is that my domain is fine: https://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/mail.jones.dk.html Microsoft-driven spam filtering is notoriously suspicious towards foreign mail. They seem to involve "popularity" in their algorithms, which is especially harmful to smaller email providers which will rarely become as popular as larger providers. They then also (indirectly, not advertised at same hosts) offer an option to buy credibility, which to me is a fundamentally flawed approach to spam scanning, and I have chosen to *not* pay to have emails from my email domain accepted into the Microsoft global "paywall". I was quite surprised to learn that an institution like MIT uses Microsoft for their email processing :-( - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
