Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-openldap-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Control: block -1 by 1006016 Control: block -1 by 1005996 Control: block -1 by 990335 Control: block -1 by 989409
Dear release team, I would like to transition to OpenLDAP 2.5 for bookworm. This is my first transition, please be gentle. :) The new version is available in experimental and has built on all release architectures. I propose the following ben file: title = "openldap"; is_affected = .build-depends ~ /\b(libldap(2)?\-dev|libslapi\-dev)\b/; is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(libldap\-2\.4\-2|libslapi\-2\.4\-2)\b/; is_good = .depends ~ /\b(libldap\-2\.5\-0|libslapi\-2\.5\-0)\b/; (libslapi apparently has no rdeps currently; included anyway for completeness.) I'm currently aware of the following issues blocking the transition: Related FTBFS: wine: #1006016 (presumed; but unable to test due to #995580) wine-development: #1005996 Unrelated FTBFS: (please tell me if these should also be linked as blocking this transition bug) uwsgi: #1006119 wine: #995580 - also tried with older unicode-data, but configure failed condor: #966726 (not in testing) kopanocore: #990322 (not in testing) libaws: #997457 (not in testing) openscap: #1000279 (not in testing) sarg: #966848 (not in testing) xemacs21: #1005992 (not in testing) Related autopkgtest failures: django-ldapdb: uses volatildap (#990335) nss-pam-ldapd: #989409 volatildap: #990335 Unrelated autopkgtest failures: python-ldap: - in unstable, has no tests - in experimental, has failing tests, but not a regression (same failure with openldap from unstable) The one that concerns me the most is wine. It has multiple RC bugs but appears to also be a key package. Thank you, Ryan
