On 04.04.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Joerg Dorchain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Joerg, > > seminar.bg3 is taken from a usenet post. Reference is e.g. > > http://groups.google.com/group/fr.comp.text.tex/msg/e1e905508b0de896?output=gplain > > or news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > (Sorry, french only) > > > > The author is obviously the same Denis GIROU who supposedly maintains > > http://tug.org/applications/Seminar/Seminar-Bugs.html. > <snip> > > As I said, we generally don't update single files in tetex, because > it would simply be too much work - it would mean to maintain our > own, Debian-specific TeX distribution. We do consider updating > certain critical things, but for sure this requires that the > upstream author says "you should *really* have this", and not just > posts it somewhere in Usenet. > Is that a acceptable answer for you? In texmf.cnf should be a local texmf tree be defined and you're free to put the file in question into that one. You may even divert seminar.bg2 if it is necessary. I suggest to tag that bug as wonfix and wait until the file made it into upstream and the upstream release into Debian. If teTeX dies it will happen in a TeX-Live release. Regards, Hilmar -- sigmentation fault
