Helge, On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 04:49:21PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > a week ago I outlined a procedure I suggest for dealing with RC bug > 188448 reported by me. In brief:
> a) Remove abuse-* from testing > b) Wait for an upload to the 32bit archs only > c) Downgrade 188448 to important (maybe only wishlist), > hence abuse-* can re-enter testing > Since the change to debian/control is trivial, I assume you can do an > NMU to achieve b) (the maintainer has not replied to the plan outlined > last week, his last email for this bug is dated September 2004). But > if you want, I can provide a patch for a NMU, just that I cannot test > it. The abuse-sdl package (along with dependent packages) has already been removed from testing as a result of this bug. Uploading a package that will FTBFS on 64-bit archs instead of building broken packages is a reasonable fix for the release-criticality of this bug; it also requires the approval/intervention of an ftp-master to remove the Once this is done the bug should be downgraded to important, which is the normal severity for non-RC portability bugs. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
