On 2022-01-20 11:51:48 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > Jonas Smedegaard <jo...@jones.dk> writes: > > > Looks good to me. But then again, I was the one with the wrong approach > > here, so not sure how much my input can be trusted ;-) > > And I'm the one who packaged this initially with *completely* bogus > names. > > I'm a bit uncertain about the Replaces and Breaks clauses in the control > file; we need to make sure to remove the current packages which are > installing the libraries with the same filename. I think I've got it > right, but another bit of review would be appreciated. > > I'll wait a week to see if Sebastian has time to respond, and if we're > still both reasonably happy with this approach, I'll go ahead and upload > it (alas, in binary form as is required for the New queue).
Looks good to me. The Breaks+Replaces can be dropped after the next upstream release. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
